Evidence for weather-dependent decisions.
Logistics, agriculture and insurance-adjacent operations act on weather. When the outcome is disputed, the observations that backed the call are the whole case.
One decision, end to end.
The decision
A weather window is approved
A route is confirmed, a sailing proceeds, a spray window opens, a work stoppage is called, based on current conditions and forecasts.
Evidence needed
What the approval relies on
Current observations and multi-model forecasts, with per-source attribution, observation times, freshness states and cross-model agreement or divergence.
The failure
What stale evidence causes
An approval on a forecast that was superseded hours earlier becomes a liability argument. Without the preserved observation, the insurer, the counterparty and the operator are left reconstructing the sky from memory.
Integration
How Dynamic Feed fits
Operational systems read commercially licensed, signed weather data via REST or MCP, with honest stale and unavailable states, never a fabricated reading.
The receipt
What remains afterward
A Decision Receipt preserving the exact observations and forecasts behind the approval, signed and timestamped, re-verifiable by any party to the dispute.
Pilot result
What thirty days should show
Each covered approval has a receipt an insurer could independently verify; divergent-model moments are honestly recorded; no decision in the window relies on silently stale data.
Where to next.
The product tour walks one observation to an independently verified receipt · verify one yourself · the 30-day pilot · REST docs · MCP connection.